Category Archives: Blog Post #4

Blog post #4

According to the book, “Seeing through Race” by Martin A. Berger, he claims that newspaper and magazine editors were more likely to use photographs that showed black people as victims rather than as civil rights defenders to promote the civil rights movement. In his view, this situation is because “the media could not assuage the racial anxieties of whites without affecting the depiction of blacks” and some editors believed that such images would maximize the interests of blacks. Berger is surely right about the media uses more photos that blacks as victims to arouse white people’s attention to blacks civil rights protection because, as he may not be aware, recent news have shown that a lot of whites protected for the killing of George Floyd because the media showed some photos that black people as victim. I think that photos showing black people as victims not only attract white people visually, but also promote racial reform in society. These photos make white viewers feel safe. What’s more, they maybe think from the perspective of equality for everyone, rather than the perspective of race first. That will make whites think that blacks who are victims also need to be protected and are equal to them. Therefore, that will make it easier to promote civil rights and racial reform.

Blog Post #4

According to the introduction of the book “Seeing through Race” by John Berger, writes about how the media uses images where it shows how blacks are being victimized for whites to feel sympathy for them. However, sometimes the media is not telling the real story or portraying it differently. I agree with Berger, the media is used to bring sympathy to whites which can also lead to a movement. For example in George Floyd, we all knew that he died because a police officer was putting force on him causing him not to breathe and when this video was posted, it went viral and people started to protest to get rights.

blog #4

I agree with Berger’s argument about racial etiquette because he was aware of what was going on during the civil rights era. The black folks were victims during a peaceful movement. They were protecting themselves from getting hit or killed. The media platform gives white audiences complimentary viewing of what’s going with the situation and not sugar-coating it. It brings people together as a community. For example, what happens to George Floyd being murdered by the officer began the black lives matter movement bringing everyone together.

Blog Post #4

According to “Seeing Through Race” By Martin Berger, he argues that the media that uses images of black Americans get more empathy from white viewers as opposed to them being united marching together protesting. I feel something in between. Although it’s good to include and show pictures of the long-standing harsh fight of oppression against Black Americans, but why when their united, protesting what’s wrong and standing up for civil justice together, it goes ignored. The media purpose is having an image and although they like to be diverse by giving recognition to minorities, they still manage their image regardless. Pictures showing violence and action, amuses people, it captivates them. We mostly hear about it in fictional books, or see it displayed on television, but when it’s happening, the media wants to show you it in its true form. It’s the same thing in advertising. They know exactly what’s going to make us read an article or click away to a headline. Pictures are messages and the more intense, the more emotions the viewer feels behind it. They still do this today in our current events as its effective in changing our society. It’s crucial to showcase the violence, because it will then just be silenced. The difference about racism back in the civil rights movement and today, is that racism in the present, is filmed. 

#blog4

I can agree with Berger’s argument as he states, in his article that newspapers and social media only show African Americans as victims. I agree with him because yes I feel like protesters, social media only do to show compassion for them instead of showing what’s really going and letting the truth be told. As now it happened with the case of Floyd, you will see African Americans posted everywhere why because they actually got together and stood up. still, news, social media, will make it seem yes there are the victims but yet there’s no respect for them. The whites editors that allow this want to make their audience believes blacks are victims in the worst way to get more (whites) audience.

Blog post #4 I Angel Zamora

According to the introduction of the book “Seeing through race”, Martin A. Berger states that the editors (who were mostly white) of newspapers and articles used photography pictures where the blacks were seen as victims in order for the whites to feel sympathy for them. I agree with Martin A. Berger because in today’s society it is still happening. For example, the whole George Floyd protests that were happening  weeks back, newspapers would report pictures of blacks in which were seen as victims and being beaten by the police. They did not show while the blacks marched together as one in order to show that they are fighting for their rights and justice to what had happened to George Floyd. Not too mention that there were many stories circulating around that he was armed or that he was not cooperating with the police offers when in reality, no one was reporting the true story. Newspapers then and now do not show the fact that they all march as one in order to fight for their rights and for justice of the inequality is happening in today’s society. Many would say that these newspapers and their photographs are simply trying to show you the reality of the news, but if that were the case then why show all the bad and make blacks seem like the bad people. Not too mention that they would make up so many stories and always leave some thing out making the blacks seem like “just another victim”.

In the book of “Seeing through Race” Martin A. Berger lays out a reinterpretation of Civil rights photography related to the U.S Civil Rights era (1950s & 1960s). According to Berger, white press had full control of hiring the photographers, reporters and editors. This situation caused a big conflict on reflection of the true story. I strongly agree that whites are in charge of hiding the true story of brutalism and violence from the Civil Rights march.

        Media has always had a powerful influence on readers. Readers beliefs are highly dependent on how media presents the story. Even though, some of pictures show how white mobs acted aggressively towards black activists, those pictures were ignored by white media. Therefore, the truth wasn’t reached to all readers. Unfortunately, we are still facing the fact that blacks are being discriminated and treated like second class citizens now. Recently we had issues similar to these in 1965. The killing of George Floyd shows we didn’t make much progress on the equalization of human rights as the struggles of black Americans still remain. Furthermore, media publishes only black violence, not how white officers use their weapons or their authority on innocent black people. I believe that Black Lives Matter is a instrumental movement in order to open people’s eyes. I hope it will change control of the media to not only show a specific narrative but give everyone a fair chance to find the truth.

Rafael Rosario | Blog #4

According to the book “Seeing through Race”, Berge argued that white editors were more likely to use photographs that featured black people as victims opposed to black people standing up for their rights. The News and social media are platforms are used for showing the people what is happing in today’s society however, sometimes these platforms advertise fake news. I agree with Berge because in today’s society for the BLM movement, George Floyd was the face of the movement; His story was all over the news, social media, etc. Showing black people as victims in today’s society makes white people feel more sympathetic in order to draw more media and news coverage. Another reason why I agree with Berge’s statement is because often the initial headlines are about what happened but not about the full story; the events leading up to the event. For example, the shooting of Breonna Taylor showed a black woman being shot by police breaking into her home and they painted Breonna as a victim. In reality, police officers shooted in self defense because Breonna’s boyfriend pulled a gun on police officers. Although this doesn’t justify what happen to Breonna Taylor, it is a prime example of how the media portrayed Breonna as a Victim and police officers as the “Bad Guys”.

Blog Post #4

During the 1950’s and 1960’s the media reported the news a little more restricted than what used to now. The media focus has been drawn towards racial violence within the African American community for example black violence or police brutality this storyline is constantly portrayed. Martin Berger explains how many newspapers and magazines editors notice that targeting the graphic realities of such communities had appealed more to the white reader. 

For society to continue advancing we need to clear balance between the positive and negative. The mainstream media need to highlight more positively within minorities instead of portraying only negative for it sets a certain stigma around POC that’s not necessarily appreciated.

Blog Post #4

In the introduction to his book, seeing through Race, Martin A. Berger argues that photographers and editors, especially white, are more likely to select photographs that portray white to black violence rather than peaceful marches and protect in order to draw more attention to the papers and gain more white supporters by making them feel secured. I agree that the media often depict the violence against blacks, such as the death to George Floyd, in order to draw sympathy from the readers, especially whites, because it makes them feel less concerned and threatened which motivates them to take interest and get involved.