For years, technology have made all humans’ activities more confortable and easier. Nowadays, most of the people have a smartphone. Done that a smartphone is a personal device, it carries with it all its owners important information related to his or her live and most important, all his or her interests. This is the reason why smartphones are so important to its owners, they contain all its interests and preferences, making it more atractive than any other thing. On the second episode (named “Space”) of “Ways of hearing” by Damon Krukowski is argued how public spaces are getting privatized when people using their devices and earbuds seem to be by their own, like nothing relevant or interesting is sourrounding them. On the same, the guest Jeremiah Moss share that people moves in ” a private kind of bubble in which to move through public space”, meaning that people refuse to go out of their bubbles to socialize, enjoy or heed their sourroundings. The overall issue is that people don’t interact with the background noises or people, what creates a big bubble of indifference. My opinion, is that this is a conservative way to see it, because I know that I really enjoy public transport, for example, but the best way for me to travel is with my earbuds, with my favourite music and looking throught the window. I don’t evite people or public situations on purpose to mantaing my confort zone, but when i am going to use public transport I don’t expect to be interacting with the people that i would see at least if they are not on my intinerary but i would do it if someone need help or some kind of situation alike. What yesterday was the public square of socialization has been replaced by social media.

Although black violence was shown in the streets I agree with Berger that newspaper and magazine editors selected photographs based on their perceived power to draw out the of their white readers, this was the best way of photographers to assuage the racial anxieties that the protests caused, conveying solidarity featuring black people as victims. Therefore, instead of portraying the protests of black people standing for their rights, they show black protestors succumbing to white violence. This was a form to evite affecting the depiction of blacks ( that could affect the social view of that newspaper or magazine ) and mantaining the white supremacy.

1. According to Berger,“publicity” images influence and affect consumers creating in them a new necessity that promises to fulfill them, to make them feel good by knowing they have the “latest” but this is accualy affecting them because what publicity makes is to create new fake necessities creating a cosumist vicious circle. This is significant to the socity because this is creating the capitalist system that we live nowadays.
2. As he compares oil painting to publicity we can see two of the most important  parts for a human, these are past and future. Oil painting was used as a form to record and share past cultures, costums, events, people, etc. Publicty actually wants to give the image of where or how you should be and what you should have to bee successfull in the future, what you should get, start, buy, consume, etc.
3. An example of an acual dream these days could be “The perfect life” that is plublished for our influencers. This dream offered by advertising use imagery to manipulate consumers by making them feel first, as If their life is not enough, as if they need more products, more activities, no work or obligations making them fell unsatisfied about what they are and what they have.